Help The Chapmans Fight Extradition To Mexico

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Is Dog's Arrest The Result Of A Prisoner Exchange Agreement Between The United States And Mexico?

Answer: Very likely.

Look at the sequence of events:

Sept. 13: Magistrate Judge Barry Kurren signs the warrant for the Chapmans' arrests.

Sept. 14: Dog, Tim, and Leland Chapmen are arrested by U.S. marshals and brought into federal custody.

Sept. 16: Mexico extradites Francisco Raphael Arellano-Felix, a member of the infamous Arellano-Felix drug cartel, to the United States to face charges for distribution of cocaine and conspiracy to distribute cocaine, carrying a maximum sentence of 30 years.

Sept. 19: Outgoing Mexican president, Vincente Fox, publicly states that Mexico is willing to extradite any drug lord in Mexico's custody that is wanted by the United States. Before Raphael's extradition on Sept. 16, Mexico had balked at sending drug kingpins to the United States, arguing that they should be brought to justice in Mexico and refusing to send anyone to the United States that would face the death penalty (and before November 2005, refusing to send anyone to the United States that would face life imprisonment).

Sept. 19: Later that same day, Arturo Sarakhan, a senior aide to incoming Mexican president Felipe Caulderon, stated that, when Calderon takes office on December 1, 2006, he will use extradition to the United States as a major weapon against Mexican drug smuggling gangs. The United States is believed to have requested Mexico to extradite three other major drug lords: (1) Osiel Cardenas, head of the Gulf Cartel; (2) Hector "El Guero" Palma, a leader of the Sinaloa Cartel; and (3) Benjamin Arellano-Felix, the leader of the Felix-Arellano Cartel until his arrest in March 2002.

Facts Supporting The Argument That The United States "Traded" Dog For Raphael.

1. Dog and Raphael are both bail-jumpers. Dog jumped bail in Mexico in July 2003 after he was arrested in Mexico for illegally detaining convicted rapist and fugitive Andrew Luster. Raphael jumped bail in the United States after he was arrested for selling 9 ounces of cocaine to an undercover police officer in a San Diego motel in 1980.

2. Dog and Raphael are both well-known public figures (albeit for very different reasons). Dog is a reality television star in the United States. Raphael is a member of the infamous Arellano-Felix drug cartel. Because both men are so well-known, each extradition sends a loud message to the public. In Raphael's case, the message is that Mexican drug dealers can't escape being prosecuted in the United States for their crimes. In Dog's case, the message is that Mexico will not tolerate United States citizens coming into Mexico and apprehending suspects in violation of Mexican law. Bounty hunting is illegal in Mexico and American citizens must respect that or face the consequences of their unauthorized actions on Mexican soil.

Maybe, Just Maybe, Dog's Arrest Is Part Of A Larger Controvesy Between The United States And Mexico.

On the prisoner exchange issue, the media's attention has been focused on the extradition of Raphael Arellano-Felix. The media has asserted that Dog may have been "traded" for Raphael. No one, however, has focused on the capture of Raphael's brother, Javier Arellano-Felix, by the United States Coast Guard off the coast of Mexico just last month. If Dog's arrest is the result of any prisoner exchange agreement between the United States and Mexico, it's much more likely to be the result of negotiations between Mexico and the United States over which country is entitled to prosecute Javier Arellano-Felix, the reputed leader of the Arellano-Felix Cartel.

This argument is based on: (1) the background on the Arellano-Felix Cartel, including the recent capture of Javier off the coast of Mexico by the U.S. Coast Guard and (2) the frosty relations between Mexico and the United States stemming from the United States' repeated attempts to enforce U.S. law extraterritorially in Mexico.

The Arellano-Felix Drug Cartel.

Until several years ago, the Arellano-Felix Cartel was Mexico's most powerful and feared drug cartel, running a vast smuggling operation out of the border city of Tijuana. There are at least five siblings that have controlled the cartel since the late 1980s. The Cartel is accused of smuggling tons of cocaine and other drugs into the United States for over a decade and for bribing public officials and murdering people on both sides of the Mexico/United States border.

Raphael Arellano-Felix, 56 years old, is the eldest of the clan. He was arrested in Mexico in 1993 and served a 10 year prison sentence in Mexico for cartel related offenses. Raphael's prison term ended in 2004, but the Mexican authorities continued to detain him in a Mexican prison pending the United States' request to extradite him, which was finally granted last week (two years later).

The Cartel lost some of its power in 2002, when its enforcer, Ramon Arellano-Felix was killed in a shootout with police and his brother, Benjamin, the gang's mastermind and leader, was arrested and jailed in March 2002.

It is believed that following Benjamin's arrest in March 2002, Javier Arellano-Felix (and possibly another brother Eduardo Arellano-Felix) assumed leadership of the cartel. To give you an idea of how important Javier and Eduardo are to the United States, the U.S. State Department put a $5 million dollar bounty each on the heads of Javier and Eduardo.

In mid-August 2006, Javier Arellano-Felix, the youngest brother (age 36), was arrested by the U.S. Coast Guard, along with 10 other people believed to be a part of the Arellano-Felix Cartel, on a ship off the coast of La Paz, Mexico. Javier was taken to San Diego to face charges of racketeering, conspiracy to commit murder, conspiracy to distribute cocaine and marijuana, and conspiracy for money laundering. The United States has indicated that it may seek the death penalty against Javier.

Shortly thereafter, Mexican Attorney General, Daniel Cabaza de Vaca, stated that the Mexican authorities would request the extradition of Javier so that he could answer for crimes committed in Mexico where he is wanted for murder, possession of illegal weapons, and organized crime. Mexico does not permit the death penalty.

In September 2006, Mexico did an about-face and stated that they would likely not request Javier's extradition until after the United States prosecuted him.

Did Dog's arrest have something to do with this about-face by the Mexican government? Did the United States agree to initiate extradition proceedings against Dog in exchange for Mexico's agreement that it would not seek Javier's extradition until Javier was prosecuted and sentenced in the United States?

We have to examine each country's extradition laws and the the foreign relations between both countries in the past several years to determine the answer to that one. So, let's begin:

The Extradition Treaty Between The United States And Mexico

Mexico and the United States entered into an extradition treaty on May 4, 1978 (31 U.S.T. 5059, T.I.A.S. No. 9656). The treaty provides a laundry list of crimes for which either country may request a suspect's extradition.


Limitations on Extradition (United States)

In addition, each country has its own laws that further restrict extradition under different circumstances. Under U.S. law, the United States will not extradite a suspect to Mexico unless the crime is: (1) within the scope of the Mexican/U.S. Treaty; (2) a crime in both Mexico and the United States; and (3) not subject to the policital offense exception.

Limitations on Extradition (Mexico)

In contrast to U.S. extradition law which is very lenient in favor of granting extradition, Mexican law has been very restrictive. Mexico will not extradite any suspect that will face the death penalty in the United States. Mexican law became even more restrictive on October 2, 2001, when the Mexican Supreme Court ruled that life sentences are cruel and unusual punishment. As a result of this law, Mexico refused to extradite any suspects to the United States unless the United States provided an assurrance that it would not seek life imprisonment.

As a result of the Mexican Supreme Court decision, very few suspects were extradited from Mexico to the United States between 2001 and 2005. Specifically, Mexico extradited to the United States 17 suspects in 2001, 25 in 2002, 31 in 2003, 34 in 2004, and 41 in 2005.

The Mexican Supreme Court overruled this decision on November 29, 2005, and held that criminal suspects faving life prison sentences abroad can be extradited from Mexico for prosecution.

The Aftermath of the November 2005 Mexican Court Decision Permitting Extradition For Life Sentences.

Mexican president Vincente Fox has observed, "Extradition in Mexico is a complex, very tortuous process."

There is evidence that, in the past year, Mexico has ignored its own extradition procedures and has illegally "extradited" at least four suspects to the United States.

Tongsun Park.

Tongsun Park was charged in New York for his participation in the UN's "Oil For Food" Program. In January 2006, he was stopped by Mexican immigration authorities and then U.S. FBI agents stationed in Mexico City escorted him on a Continental Airlines flight from Mexico to Houston where he was taken into custody. This is an example of Mexico sending a suspect to the United States without following the mandated legal processes of extradition or deporation.

Arthur March.

In January 2006, Mexico illegally "extradited" a second suspect from Mexico to the United States. Arthur March was arrested in front of his favorite donut shop in Mexico by Mexican police and then transferred to U.S. FBI custody in Gaudalajara, Mexico where he was then sent to Houston. March was picked up on an interpol warrant -- under which he would normally face deportation or an extradition hearing. Mexico, however, found it more convenient to simply put March on a plane without following any of its own established legal procedures for deportation or extradition.

Jose Ernesto Beltrain.

Beltrain is a Mexican man that was accused of making up a story about a planned nuclear terrorist attack on Boston. Under the U.S./Mexican Treaty, Beltrain probably would not have been extradited had he gone through a formal extradition hearing because "hoax-making" is not a crime under Mexican law (and thus not a basis for extradition under the treaty). Mexican police circumvented this "technicality" by arresting Beltrain and turning him over to the U.S. FBI who then escorted Beltrain to San Diego to face charges.

Salvadore Rodriguez Jr.

In March 2006, Rodriguez was "extradited" to the United States. It is unclear whether he went through the normal extradition process. Typically, a person who is formally extradited is transferred to the custody of U.S. Marshals. Here, Rodriguez was transferred to the custody of the U.S. FBI. This could mean he was deported or that he was simply summarily removed from Mexico as were Park, March, and Beltrain.

The United States' Complicity In Mexico's Illegal "Extradition" Of Suspects From Mexico To The United States.

In 1992, the United States Supreme Court held that the fact of a suspect's forcible abduction from Mexico does not prohibit his trial in the United States for violations of U.S. criminal laws. United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992). In that case, U.S. authorities abducted a Mexican citizen from his home in Mexico and flew him to the United States to stand trial for criminal charges stemming from his participation in the murder of a DEA agent. The U.S. Supreme Court held that even though Alvarez-Machain's abduction was "shocking" and possibly in violation of general international law principles and even though Mexico had protested the abduction through diplomatic notes, Alvarez-Machain's abduction did not violate the U.S./Mexican Extradition Treaty and thus he could be tried in the United States. In other words, the U.S. Supreme Court basically held that U.S. law permits a suspect to be illegally removed (ie, kidnapped) from Mexico to stand trial in the United States.

TO BE CONTINUED..............

6 Comments:

  • I don't understand everything about the law. But I know this much. Andrew Luster was a fugtive on the Run. He fled to Mexico where he thought he was safe. Expect for the fact that according to American Law a bounty hunter can go to any extremes to capture a fugtive. Ok look at from this prospective Mexico is always sending bounty hunters into the U.S.A. to capture criminals so what makes it any different than an American Bounty hunter going to Mexico to capture a fugtive from America? So here is my opinion America should stand up for a man who gives of who he is and what it could cost him is his life. To tell Mexico ok here is the deal we won't press charges on your unwanted bounty hunters if you leave ours alone.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:23 PM  

  • I think it is hypocritical for a bounty hunter, one who goes after people that skip out on bail, to not consider or think that this would also apply to him. I love the show (Dog the Bounty hunter) and I really hope foe a favorable outcome. But let us remember that being American dose not mean that we can break the law in other countries.

    Chapman family, I am praying that God’s favor is upon you and that the three hero’s are not sent back to Mexico. Gods mercy be shown to your family.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:44 PM  

  • These men did a justice for the United States, and now they are being punished for it. They are not guilty of any crime or criminal act. If you ask me, these men are heros. As a victim of rape myself, to hear that a rapist was brought to justice is like finding out that your pregnant. It's one of the biggest joys in the world. It makes no difference where the bastard was picked up, or who picked him up, or how they did it, the fact of the matter is, is that it was done and the bastard is in prison to face the concequences that he deserves. As for Dog skipping bail, how the hell can a man skip bail when the feds themselves brought him back to the US, and put an ankle bracelet on his leg with a curfew as to when he has to be HOME? Its evident that one of his so-called fans don't watch the show as much as they say they do. The Chapman gang should be praised for what they did, not persecuted. And if anyone is the hipocrite here, its the US Federal Justice System. I love America and all it stands for, but I fear that with the way the government is now a days, one day we will be wondering what the hell our troops, police department, bounty hunters, and our children are fighting for. And thats extreamly sad to think about. Did we not just try a man and sentence him to hang because he sacrificed the lives of the people in his country and killed thousands of Americans simply to show the power he had over them. Now the US government is willing to sacrifice the lives of 3 American hero's, who have brought thousands of men and women to justice, and saved many from being victims of the crimes that these people have commited and could possibly commit again, simply for there reputation with another country and a few dollars. For the bragging rights of putting a MEXICAN drug lord in jail. A man that outsmarted the US government, a man that the US had no part in the capture. Quite frankly, I thought it was against the law to buy, sell or trade human beings. But I guess the govenment doesn't have to follow the laws that they make huh. Who's the fucking hipocrite now?

    I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the Chapman Family for their dedication, hard work, and time away from there families, to make sure that not only your families, but ours as well can have the confedence of well being and the feeling of safety, knowing that your on our side. I want you to know that you have one hell of a fanbase nationwide, and we all have your back. FREE THE DOG is on numerous myspace websites ranging from Texas to the United Kingdom bro, so you are never alone. It's not over till the fat lady sings, and I haven't sang a word. Just keep your head up and full of positive thoughts and God will prevail. Beth I would like to commend you on your courage, bravery and your strength. You are a true rolemodel for women everywhere. God Bless you sister, and The Chapman Family.

    Always & Forever,
    Lisa Johnson
    Austin, Tx
    ldj@austin.rr.com

    By Anonymous Lisa Johnson, at 2:11 PM  

  • My bгothеr suggеstеd Ι mіght lіkе this blog.
    He was totally гight. Τhis publish aсtually made my day.
    You can not consіdeг ѕimply hoω а lοt timе
    I had ѕpent for this іnfo! Thank you!

    my hοmеpage - used bucket truck sales
    My webpage - bucket trucks

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:53 PM  

  • I lіke the νaluable infоrmation you
    pгovide to your articles. I'll bookmark your blog and take a look at again here regularly. I am somewhat sure I'll be tolԁ many nеw stuff ρroрer гіght heгe!

    Best of luck for the following!

    Also visit my page pain relief during pregnancy

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:59 AM  

  • Gгeеtingѕ, I dо belieѵe your blog could
    be having wеb browseг compatibіlity problеms.
    When I take a look аt your webѕite іn Safari,
    it loоks fine but when opening in IE, it has some overlapping issues.
    I sіmplу ωantеd to give you a quіck heads up!
    Aѕide from that, wonderful blοg!


    My web sitе: Www.lgtensunits.com

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:09 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home